The Hidden Cost of Biological Nitrogen Removal in US Wastewater Treatment

The Hidden Cost of Biological Nitrogen Removal in US Wastewater Treatment

For every ton of ammonia destroyed by traditional Biological Nitrogen Removal (BNR), facility operators sacrifice immense amounts of energy, expensive chemicals, and capital. At the same time, they throw away a vital nutrient that the agricultural and commercial fertilizer industries value at hundreds of dollars per ton.

In the United States, as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tightens nutrient discharge limits for municipal and industrial facilities, continuing with business-as-usual nitrogen destruction is becoming a major financial liability.

What Is Biological Nitrogen Removal?

Biological nitrogen removal (BNR) is the multi-stage process where ammonia in wastewater, industrial streams, or anaerobic digestate is converted first to nitrate (nitrification) and then to nitrogen gas (denitrification) via specialized microbial activity.

Through this process, the nitrogen simply vents into the atmosphere. While regulatory compliance under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is technically achieved, the underlying operational costs keep climbing.

For decades, BNR has served as the default engineering solution for ammonia treatment.

 The biological process is well understood, state regulatory approvals are standard, and the infrastructure is proven. However, as US energy grids face rising volatility and facilities navigate stricter decarbonization mandates, environmental engineers are asking a fundamental question:

 Is destroying nitrogen really the best use of resources?

The Energy Burden on US Infrastructure

Nitrogen destruction is inherently energy-intensive. BNR requires massive, continuous aeration to keep nitrifying bacteria alive. In typical domestic and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), aeration already represents the single largest consumer of electricity on-site, frequently accounting for 40% to 60% of a facility’s total energy footprint.

This issue multiplies when dealing with high-strength ammonia streams, such as reject water from anaerobic digestion. This is a critical pain point in the United States, where the rapid expansion of agricultural waste-to-energy projects—particularly those handling poultry waste and chicken manure—generates digestate with exceptionally high ammonia concentrations.

Treating poultry-heavy digestate via BNR demands massive oxygen transfer rates, oversized blower systems, and a staggering amount of grid power.

The Hidden Operational Costs Beyond Electricity

The true cost of operating a traditional BNR system extends far beyond the utility bill:

Supplemental Carbon Sourcing

Denitrification requires a volatile organic carbon source (typically methanol or acetic acid) when the incoming Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is too low. This adds thousands of dollars in recurring chemical expenditures.

Alkalinity supplementation

Nitrification naturally destroys alkalinity. To prevent process failure and maintain pH stability, operators must continuously dose expensive additives like lime, caustic soda, or sodium bicarbonate.

Sludge Handling and Disposal Costs

BNR generates a massive biological floc. This secondary sludge must be thickened, chemically dewatered, hauled, and landfilled—directly increasing tipping fees and the facility’s Scope 1 and Scope 3 carbon footprint.

Massive Infrastructure Footprint

Traditional BNR requires extensive real estate for large aeration basins, anoxic tanks, and secondary clarifiers. For existing US plants facing space constraints, physical expansion is often cost-prohibitive.

Extreme Operational Complexity

Keeping nitrifiers and denitrifiers balanced requires highly skilled operators, continuous analytical monitoring, and constant adjustments to counter toxicity or temperature drops.

The Ultimate Waste: Destroying Commercial Value

Perhaps the most overlooked drawback of BNR is that it destroys a high-value commodity. The global fertilizer market relies heavily on nitrogen, while the emerging clean energy sector increasingly views ammonia as an essential hydrogen carrier. Facilities executing BNR are, in effect, paying to destroy a resource with severe market demand.

High-Ammonia Waste Streams
Traditional BNR
Atmospheric Loss $0 Value / High Energy Cost
High-Ammonia Waste Streams
OTAR® System
Recovered Ammonium Hydroxide High-Value Asset

Through advanced recovery, high-strength streams like poultry digestate can be transformed into recovered ammonium hydroxide. When processed correctly, these recovered nutrients can fulfill criteria for circular economy initiatives, providing local agricultural regions with a sustainable source of liquid nitrogen fertilizer.

For commercial farms looking to satisfy strict environmental supply chain requirements or produce high-value crops, recovering these nutrients aligns perfectly with modern sustainable agriculture practices.

A Direct Solution: On-Site Thermal Ammonia Recovery (OTAR®)

OTAR® (On-site Thermal Ammonia Recovery), developed by the Organics Group, offers a closed-loop alternative to traditional biological destruction. Instead of relying on sensitive microbial populations and costly aeration, the OTAR® platform utilizes thermal energy—often tapping directly into low-cost waste heat from on-site biogas combined heat and power (CHP) engines—to strip ammonia out of the liquid phase and capture it.

Why US Facility Managers are Turning to OTAR®:

  • Modular & Scalable: The system is built on a compact, skidded footprint that integrates seamlessly into existing industrial infrastructure or agricultural biogas plants without expanding real estate.
  • Adaptable Outflows: Where local agricultural off-take markets exist, OTAR® captures the nitrogen as commercial-grade ammonium hydroxide. In regions without an immediate fertilizer buyer, the system can efficiently destroy the ammonia thermally using the same on-site waste heat—eliminating the need for aeration entirely.
  • Proven Reliability: Moving away from BNR does not mean adopting an unproven risk. The OTAR® technology brings over two decades of successful, large-scale international operational history to the US market.

Nitrogen is a valuable resource, and treating it as a waste product is no longer economically viable.

Up Next in This Series: We will break down the exact financial metrics, quantifying the dollar value of the ammonia leaving your facility every day—and calculate the precise ROI of capturing it on-site.

Assess Your Wastewater Treatment & Recovery Potential with Organics!

Fill out a short questionnaire and let our team review your specifications, calculate estimated chemical and thermal requirements, and schedule a direct consultation with an Organics specialist.


The Emerald Option

The Emerald Option

Ammonia, an Abundant Natural Element

Within the solar system, there is an abundance of ammonia spread throughout the planets. Astrogeologists estimate there are approximately 220 million km2 of sub-surface ammonia-water oceans on 14 solar system moons as well as the planet Pluto. One ocean on Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, is estimated to have a surface area of 80 million km2. On Earth, oceans cover 361 million km2, but none are composed of ammonia.

Sources of Ammonia on Earth

On Earth, there are no ammonia oceans, but copious quantities are produced each year. It is estimated that the total non-manufactured production of ammonia is some 290 million tonnes per year (tpy). Of this total, approximately 130 tpy derive from humans and livestock. Non-industrial ammonia production is augmented by the Haber-Bosch process which is the source of a further 200 million tpy.

One of the primary naturally occurring sources of ammonia originates from the decay of organic matter. Ammonia forms during the degradation of amino acids within acidogenesis. It also forms part of the excreta cycle of humans and animals as the kidneys secrete ammonia to neutralize excess acid. Consequently, it is a commonly encountered water pollutant.

To many wastewater engineers, ammonia in water represents a problem that costs money to fix. If a carbon source is required to treat the ammonia, as food for anoxic bacteria, annual costs can run into the millions.

Ammonia is also recognized as being toxic to fish. Lethal concentrations range from 2.5 to 25 mg/I. Further, as ammonia is biologically oxidized to nitrate, it exerts an oxygen demand on the receiving water. This can reduce the oxygen in the water to a point where aquatic life forms cannot survive. Ammonia also acts as a fertilizer causing the profuse growth of stringy bacteria and/or fungi and generally disrupting the natural environment.

In this article, Dr. Robert Eden discusses the latest innovations in the technology for the separation of ammonia from wastewater and landfill leachate.

Ammonia from Wastewater

Ammonia from Wastewater

Wastewater management can be complicated. A principal reason is that excessive ammonia concentration in wastewater can cause issues with odor and the ability to clean and reuse the water. If it is not removed before release to the environment, it is highly toxic for aquatic life.

Ammonia is increasingly recognized as a compound that, whilst being highly polluting if released to the environment untreated, can also be recovered and thus represent a viable commercial resource. Using waste heat as the basis for ammonia removal and recovery meets the combined objectives of ensuring a long-term sustainable two-pronged solution to the challenges of ammonia pollution and the recycling of waste material; this latter is one of the defining tenets of the circular economy.

The principle of using heat to separate ammonia from landfill leachate is being successfully applied in Hong Kong. On this large landfill site, leachate is highly ammoniated, containing up to 8000 mg/l. As the site produces so much landfill gas, this is used to heat the leachate before separation in the stripping towers. From there, the ammonia concentration is reduced to <150mg/l and is treated by the adjacent sequence batch reactors before release outside the boundary of the landfill site. The site produces up to 9 tons of ammonia a day.